Testing Guides & Best Practices

Your IDE’s debug AI can be hijacked by logs, comments, and test data. We map the threat model, demo exploits, and deliver a mitigation playbook: trace sanitization, tool sandboxing, least-privilege APIs, and safe prompting patterns.

A blueprint for wiring logs, spans, and heap snapshots into code debugging AI so fixes are reproducible and tied to real requests. Covers OpenTelemetry context, data retention, privacy, and how to evaluate grounded patches.

Blueprint for pairing property-based tests, shadow execution, and LLM reasoning to surface nondeterministic bugs in microservices—without flaky tests or production risk.

How to architect a debugging AI that replays failures: capture execution traces, build causal slices, use trace‑RAG and delta debugging in CI, and auto‑triage flaky tests—so fixes are reproducible, safe, and reviewable.

A practical, repo-and-build-aware RAG architecture for code debugging AI. Index symbols, ASTs, stack traces, logs, and build graphs; add query planning and caching; wire it into CI to ground suggestions and reduce noisy patches.

Most debug AIs fail on flaky bugs. Deterministic record/replay, eBPF traces, and time‑travel debugging can give AI a reproducible execution context to isolate root causes and produce reliable fixes.

How to instrument your AI code debug agents with full trace capture, prompts, diffs, artifacts, and environment snapshots—enabling deterministic repros, audits, and safe rollbacks inside fast CI/CD.

How to capture full execution traces so a debugging AI can reproduce failures, test patches, and ship verifiable PRs: hermetic builds, syscall recording, sandboxing, CI.

Attackers can hide instructions in logs and stack traces to hijack AI debug agents. Learn threat models, log scrubbing, sandboxed tools, and CI/CD guardrails to keep agents trustworthy.

A record‑replay pipeline with eBPF traces and sandboxed re‑execution lets code debugging AI reproduce production failures safely—no prod shells, PII‑aware workflows, faster RCA, and verifiable fixes.

Most AI fixes are unverifiable. This article lays out a rigorous workflow that makes AI-assisted debugging accountable: deterministic reproductions, auto-generated tests from traces, coverage and mutation gates, and cryptographically signed diffs and trace attestations that CI can enforce.

A blueprint for an AI debugging system that converts logs and traces into deterministic replays, synthesizes failing tests, and proposes minimal patches—balancing performance, privacy, and false positives in modern software stacks.

LLM fixes fail when runs aren’t reproducible. Learn how to feed record‑replay traces, snapshots, and invariant checks to a debug AI, turning flaky logs into deterministic investigations and CI‑safe patches.